4-4. | Identify individual terms and quantifier phrases in the following sentence and indicate links between pronouns and their antecedents. (You can do this by marking up an English sentence; you are not being asked to provide a symbolic analysis.) |
Al called everyone who left him a message concerning the accident and told them he had seen it.
[answer] |
Analyze the following generalizations in as much detail as possible. Provide a key to the non-logical vocabulary (upper and lower case letters) appearing in your answer and restate the result using an unrestricted quantifier. | |
4-5. |
Every employee received the letter.
[answer] |
4-6. |
Among bystanders, Sam interviewed only soldiers.
[answer] |
Analyze the following sentences in as much detail as possible, providing a key to the non-logical vocabulary (upper and lower case letters) appearing in your answer. | |
5-1. |
If anyone guessed the number, the prize was awarded.
[answer] |
5-2. |
Everyone who worked on any part of the project was honored.
[answer] |
Synthesize an English sentence whose analysis would yield the following form. | |
5-3. |
(∀x: Px) ¬ ∀y Axy
[A: λxy (x ate y); P: λx (x is a person)] [answer] |
Use derivations to establish the validity of the following arguments. You may use attachment rules. | ||
5-4. |
|
|
5-5. |
|
5-6. | Use a derivation to show that the following argument is not valid and describe a structure dividing one of the derivation's open gaps. (You will not need the rules UG+, RUG+, and ST introduced in §7.8 that are designed to avoid unending gaps.) | |
|
4-4. |
|
5-3. |
(∀x: x is a person) ¬ ∀y x ate y
(∀x: x is a person) ¬ x ate everything No one is such that (he or she ate everything) No one ate everything |
5-4. |
|
5-5. |
|