| Phi 449 Fall 2013 |
|
(Site navigation is not working.) |
Requirements:
Writing:
Several papers—
(1)two short papers of 600-900 words, one reporting something you noticed in Kemp Smith’s commentary and another framing an interpretative issue,
(2)a longer paper of 1500-1800 words commenting on the item of secondary literature that you have chosen for class discussion, and
(3)a final paper of c. 4000-5000 words in which you pose and answer a interpretative question in a way that is informed by secondary literature.
Participation:
(4)Regular, prepared, and active participation in class discussion and timely completion of graded assignments.
Your final grade will be based on these in the following way: 7.5% each for the short papers, 15% for the secondary literature comment, 50% for the final paper, and 20% for participation in discussion and other aspects of class participation.
Attendance and due dates:
As part of my evaluation of your participation, I will be keeping a record of your attendance. You will be automatically excused if you notify me in advance that you will miss a class (e-mail or voice-mail messages are fine). After the fact, I will expect you to have a good reason. Due dates for the papers are subject to negotiation. I set a default due date for the class, but I am willing to set individual due dates (within reason) for those who find that inconvenient. My policy on missed deadlines is similar to that on missed classes: I’ll re-negotiate the deadline (again within reason) if I hear in advance; but after the fact, I’ll expect an excuse. Unexcused missed deadlines will have an effect on your participation grade.