Write a paper (c. 2-3 pp. or 600-900 words) in which you discuss a passage in which Russell or Moore makes a claim to which you can imagine someone (perhaps you) having an objection. In your discussion of this passage, you should do the following:

• briefly describe the claim,

• outline Russell’s or Moore’s reasons for making it,

• indicate the reasons why someone might object, and

• discuss the relative strength of the two sides in a way that indicates how someone sympathetic to the original claim might respond to the objection.

There are too many topics fitting this description for me to attempt a list, but I’ll be happy to help you look for one if nothing comes to mind. The passage you write about will vary in length depending on the topic (and might not be contiguous text), but the sort of claim together with reasons that you could address in a paper this length will probably be on the scale of several sentences or a short paragraph.