Phi 270 Fall 2013 |
|
(Site navigation is not working.) |
Phi 270 F98 test 2
F98 test 2 questions
1. |
Analyze the sentence below in as much detail as possible and express the result in both symbolic and English notation. Be sure that the unanalyzed components of your answer are complete and independent sentences and try to respect any grouping in the original sentence.
Bob didn’t have both fuel and either a match or a lighter
answer
|
2. |
Synthesize an idiomatic English sentence expressing the proposition which is assigned to the symbolic form below by the intensional interpretation to its right—i.e., give an English sentence whose analysis would be the following:
¬ ((A ∧ B) ∨ (N ∧ L))
A: Carol saw Ann; B: Carol saw Bill; N: Dave saw Ann; L: Dave saw Bill
answer |
Use derivations to check each of the following claims of entailment. You may use the detachment rule MPT but not MTP; although the use of MPT is not necessary, it can shorten a couple of the derivations. If a derivation fails, confirm a counterexample that lurks in an open gap. | ||
3. |
B ⊨ ¬ (A ∧ ¬ B)
answer |
|
4. |
¬ (A ∧ B) ⊨ ¬ (C ∧ ¬ B)
answer |
|
5. |
¬ (A ∧ ¬ (B ∧ C)) ⊨ ¬ (A ∧ ¬ C)
answer |
|
6. |
A ∨ (B ∧ C) ⊨ C ∨ A
answer |
F98 test 2 answers
2. |
¬ ((Carol saw Ann ∧ Carol saw Bill) ∨ (Dave saw Ann ∧ Dave saw Bill)) ¬ (Carol saw both Ann and Bill ∨ Dave saw both Ann and Bill) Neither Carol nor Dave saw both Ann and Bill |
3. |
|
5. |
|
OR
|
6. |
|
OR
|