1. | Identify individual terms and quantifier phrases in the following sentence and indicate links between pronouns and their antecedents. (You can do this by marking up an English sentence; you are not being asked to provide a symbolic analysis.) |
Al called everyone who left him a message concerning the accident and told them he had seen it.
answer |
Analyze the following generalizations in as much detail as possible. Provide a key to the non-logical vocabulary (upper and lower case letters) appearing in your answer and restate the result using an unrestricted quantifier. | |
2. |
Every employee received the letter.
answer |
3. |
Among bystanders, Sam interviewed only soldiers.
answer |
Analyze the following sentences in as much detail as possible, providing a key to the non-logical vocabulary (upper and lower case letters) appearing in your answer. | |
4. |
If anyone guessed the number, the prize was awarded.
answer |
5. |
Everyone who worked on any part of the project was honored.
answer |
Synthesize an English sentence whose analysis would yield the following form. | |
6. |
(∀x: Px) ¬ ∀y Axy
A: [ _ ate _ ]; P: [ _ is a person] answer |
Use derivations to establish the validity of the following arguments. You may use attachment rules. | |
7. |
∀x Fx
answer
∀x Gx ∀x (Fx ∧ Gx) |
8. |
∀x (Fx → Rxa)
answer
∀x (Rxa → ∀y Ryx) ∀x ∀y (Fy → Rxy) |
9. | Use a derivation to show that the following argument is not valid and describe a structure dividing one of the derivation’s open gaps. (You will not need the rules UG+ and ST introduced in §7.8 that are designed to avoid unending gaps.) |
∀x Rxx
answer
Rab → ∀x Rxa |
Phi 270 F96 test 4 answers
1. |
|
6. |
(∀x: x is a person) ¬ ∀y x ate y
(∀x: x is a person) ¬ x ate everything No one is such that (he or she ate everything) No one ate everything |
7. |
|
9. |
|