Analyze the sentences below in as much detail as possible using connectives; that is, you should not identify components that are individual terms (or predicates or functors). Present the result in both symbolic and English notation. Be sure that the unanalyzed components of your answer are complete and independent sentences; also try to respect any grouping in the English. | |
1. |
If it rains, you will get wet if you’re outside
answer |
2. |
Al missed breakfast only if he overslept
answer |
Use derivations to check whether each of the entailments below holds. You may use detachment and attachment rules. If an entailment fails, present a counterexample that divides an open gap. | |
3. |
A → (B → C) ⊨ (A → ¬ C) → (A → ¬ B)
answer |
4. |
A → B ⊨ ¬ A ∧ B
answer |
Analyze the sentence below in as much detail as possible. In this case you should identify components that are individual terms, predicates, or functors. Be sure that the unanalyzed components of your answer are independent (in particular, that none contains a pronoun whose antecedent is in another). | |
5. |
Unless Al is the file’s owner, the system didn’t let him open it
answer |
Expand the following sentence in all possible ways on each of the terms appearing in it (i.e., you need not use vacuous abstraction). | |
6. |
Tabc
answer |
Use a derivation to show that the entailment below holds. You may use detachment and attachment rules. | |
7. |
A → Ra(fb), Rb(fa) → Ga ⊨ A → (¬ Gb → ¬ a = b)
answer |
2. |
¬ Al missed breakfast ← ¬ Al overslept
¬ M ← ¬ O [or: ¬ O → ¬ M)]
M: Al missed breakfast; O:Al overslept
if not O then not M
|
3. |
|
5. |
¬ Al is the file’s owner → the system didn’t let Al open the file
¬ Al is the file’s owner → ¬ the system let Al open the file ¬ Al = the file’s owner → ¬ [ _ let _ open _ ] the system Al the file ¬ a = [ _’s owner] the file → ¬ Lsaf
¬ a = of → ¬ Lsaf
L: [ _ let _ open _ ]; a: Al; f: the file; o: [ _’s owner]; s: the system
|
6. |
[Txbc]xa
[Taxc]xb [Tabx]xc |
7. |
|