Analyze the sentences below in as much detail as possible, providing a key to the non-logical vocabulary you use. Restate 2 using an unrestricted quantifier. | |
1. |
Sam checked every lock
answer |
2. |
No one who was in the office answered the call
[Remember to restate your answer in 2 using an unrestricted quantifier.] answer |
3. |
Ralph got the joke if anyone did
answer |
4. |
Only bestsellers were on every list
answer |
Use derivations to show that the following arguments are valid. You may use any rules. | |
5. |
∀x Fx
answer
∀x ¬ Gx ∀x (Fx ∧ ¬ Gx) |
6. |
∀x (Rxa → ∀y Txy)
answer
∀x ∀y (Rya → Tyx) |
Use a derivation to show that the following argument is not valid and present a counterexample by describing a structure that divides an open gap. (You may describe the structure either by depicting it in a diagram, as answers in the text usually do, or by giving tables.) | |
7. |
∀x Rax
answer
∀x (Rxa → Rxx) |
1. |
Sam checked every lock Every lock is such that (Sam checked it) (∀x: x is a lock) Sam checked x
(∀x: Lx) Csx
C: [ _ checked _ ]; L: [ _ is a lock]; s: Sam
|
5. |
|
7. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Counterexample presented by a diagram |
Counterexample presented by tables
|