Analyze the sentence below in as much detail as possible, presenting the result in both symbolic and English notation. Be sure that the unanalyzed components of your answer are complete and independent sentences; also try to respect any grouping in the English. | ||
1. |
Fred crossed the desert without having both a jack and a spare tire.
answer |
|
2. |
Bob either found someone to go or went himself, but neither Carol nor her luggage was there.
answer |
Use derivations to check whether each of the entailments below holds. You may use detachment and attachment rules. If an entailment fails, provide a table in which you calculate the truth values of the premises and conclusion on an extensional interpretation (i.e., an assignment of truth values) that divides an open gap. | ||
3. |
A ∧ ¬ B ⇒ ¬ (B ∧ ¬ C)
answer |
|
4. |
¬ (¬ A ∧ B) ⇒ C
answer |
|
5. |
(A ∧ B) ∨ C, ¬ (A ∧ D) ⇒ C ∨ ¬ D
answer |
|
6. |
B ∨ (C ∧ D) ⇒ A ∨ (B ∨ C)
answer |
7. |
[This question was on a topic not covered in F08]
Use replacement principles to put the following sentence into disjunctive normal form (in which there are no negated compounds and no conjunction has a disjunction as a component):
¬ ((A ∧ ¬ B) ∨ C)
answer |
3. |
|
5. |
|
OR |
|
6. |
|
OR |
|
7. |
[This question was on a topic not covered in F08]
¬ ((A ∧ ¬ B) ∨ C)
|