5.2.xa. Exercise answers
1. | a. |
Tom was late ← ¬ Tom left early
L ← ¬ E
E: Tom left early; L: Tom was late
¬ E → L if not E then L
|
b. |
¬ you’ll get a good picture ← ¬ you’ll take the cap off the lens
¬ P ← ¬ C
C: you’ll take the cap off the lens; P: you’ll get a good picture
¬ C → ¬ P if not C then not P
|
|
c. |
Neither Ann nor Bill knew of it ← ¬ Ann and Bill both knew of it ¬ (Ann knew of it ∨ Bill knew of it) ← ¬ (Ann knew of it ∧ Bill knew of it)
¬ (A ∨ B) ← ¬ (A ∧ B)
A: Ann knew of it; B: Bill knew of it
¬ (A ∧ B) → ¬ (A ∨ B) if not both A and B then not either A or B
|
|
d. |
The bill will pass if the chairman supports it ← ¬ public opinion will run heavily against the bill (the bill will pass ← the chairman will support the bill) ← ¬ A
(P ← S) ← ¬ A
A: public opinion will run heavily against the bill; P: the bill will pass; S: the chairman will support the bill
¬ A → (S → P) if not A then if S then P
|
e. |
¬ Ed will be late → we’ll get started on time and finish early if there isn’t a lot of business ¬ L → (we’ll get started on time ∧ we’ll finish early if there isn’t a lot of business) ¬ L → (T ∧ (we’ll finish early ← there won’t be a lot of business)) ¬ L → (T ∧ (F ← ¬ there will be a lot of business))
¬ L → (T ∧ (F ← ¬ B))
B: there will be a lot of business; F: we’ll finish early; L: Ed will be late; T: we’ll get started on time
¬ L → (T ∧ (¬ B → F)) if not L then both T and if not B then F
It would be possible to understand the sentence to make the whole of we’ll get started on time and finish early conditional on there won’t be a lot of business. On that interpretation, the form would be ¬ L → (¬ B → (T ∧ F)). However, the interpretation used above fits better with common sense expectations concerning the content, and that is often the grounds on which ambiguous sentences are understood in a particular way. |
|
f. |
Bob was under no obligation to help → Bob worked only if he was in a good mood and had nothing to do ¬ Bob was under an obligation to help → (¬ Bob worked ← ¬ Bob was in a good mood and had nothing to do) ¬ O→ (¬ W ← ¬ (Bob was in a good mood ∧ Bob had nothing to do)) ¬ O→ (¬ W ← ¬ (G ∧ ¬ Bob had something to do))
¬ O→ (¬ W ← ¬ (G ∧ ¬ S))
O: Bob was under an obligation to help; G: Bob was in a good mood; S: Bob had something to do; W: Bob worked
¬ O→ (¬ (G ∧ ¬ S) → ¬ W) if not O then if not both G and not S then not W
|
2. | a. |
¬ I’ll see it → ¬ I’ll believe it
Unless I see it, I won’t believe it or: I’ll believe it only if I see it |
b. |
¬ the set works ← ¬ (the set is plugged in ∧ ¬ the set is broken) ¬ the set works ← ¬ (the set is plugged in ∧ the set isn’t broken) ¬ the set works ← ¬ (the set is plugged in and isn’t broken) The set works only if it is plugged in and isn’t broken or: The set doesn’t work unless it is plugged in and isn’t broken |
|
c. |
¬ (Adams will back out ∨ Brown will back out) → (the deal will go through ← ¬ (Collins will have trouble with financing ∨ Davis will have trouble with financing)) ¬ Adams or Brown will back out → (the deal will go through ← ¬ Collins or Davis will have trouble with financing) Unless Adams or Brown backs out, the deal will go through if neither Collins nor Davis has trouble with financing or: If neither Adams nor Brown backs out, the deal will go through unless Collins or Davis has trouble with financing or: Unless Adams nor Brown backs out, the deal will go through unless Collins or Davis has trouble with financing |