Phi 270 F04 test 4
Analyze the sentences below in as much detail as possible, providing a key to the non-logical vocabulary you use. Restate 2 using an unrestricted quantifier.
1. Sam checked every lock
answer
2. No one who was in the office answered the call
[Remember to restate your answer in 2 using an unrestricted quantifier.]
answer
3. Ralph got the joke if anyone did
answer
4. Only bestsellers were on every list
answer
Use derivations to show that the following arguments are valid. You may use any rules.
5.
∀x Fx
∀x ¬ Gx
∀x (Fx ∧ ¬ Gx)
answer
6.
∀x (Rxa → ∀y Txy)
∀x ∀y (Rya → Tyx)
answer
Use a derivation to show that the following argument is not valid and present a counterexample by describing a structure that divides an open gap. (You may describe the structure either by depicting it in a diagram, as answers in the text usually do, or by giving tables.)
7.
∀x Rax
∀x (Rxa → Rxx)
answer

Phi 270 F04 test 4 answers
1.

Sam checked every lock

Every lock is such that (Sam checked it)

(∀x: x is a lock) Sam checked x

(∀x: Lx) Csx
C: [ _ checked _ ]; L: [ _ is a lock]; s: Sam
2.

No one who was in the office answered the call

No one who was in the office is such that (he or she answered the call)

(∀x: x is a person who was in the office) ¬ x answered the call

(∀x: x is a person ∧ x was in the office) ¬ Axc

(∀x: Px ∧ Nxo) ¬ Axc
∀x ((Px ∧ Nxo) → ¬ Axc)
A: [ _ answered _ ]; P: [ _ is a person]; N: [ _ was in _ ]; c: the call; o: the office
3.

Ralph got the joke if anyone did

Everyone is such that (Ralph got the joke if he or she did)

(∀x: x is a person) Ralph got the joke if x did

(∀x: Px) (Ralph got the joke ← x got the joke)

(∀x: Px) (Grj ← Gxj)
(∀x: Px) (Gxj → Grj)
P: [ _ is a person]; G: [ _ got _ ]; j: the joke
4.

Only bestsellers were on every list

Only bestsellers are such that (they were on every list)

(∀x: ¬ x is a bestseller) ¬ x was on every list

(∀x: ¬ Bx) ¬ every list is such that (x was on it)

(∀x: ¬ Bx) ¬ (∀y: y is a list) x was on y

(∀x: ¬ Bx) ¬ (∀y: Ly) Nxy
B: [ _ is a bestseller]; L: [ _ is a list]; N: [ _ was on _ ]
5.
│∀x Fx a: 3
│∀x ¬ Gx a: 5
├─
│ⓐ
3 UI │││Fa (4)
│││●
││├─
4 QED │││Fa 2
││
5 UI │││¬ Ga (6)
│││●
││├─
6 QED │││¬ Ga 2
│├─
2 Cnj ││Fa ∧ ¬ Ga 1
├─
1 UG │∀x (Fx ∧ ¬ Gx)
6.
│∀x (Rxa → ∀y Txy) c:4
├─
│ⓑ
││ⓒ
││││Rca (5)
│││├─
4 UI ││││Rca → ∀y Tcy 5
5 MPP ││││∀y Tcy b: 6
6 UI ││││Tcb (7)
││││●
│││├─
7 QED ││││Tcb 3
││├─
3 CP │││Rca → Tcb 2
│├─
2 UG ││∀y (Rya → Tyb) 1
├─
1 UG │∀x ∀y (Rya → Tyx)
7.
│∀x Rax a:4, b:5
├─
│ⓑ
│││Rba
││├─
││││¬ Rbb
│││├─
4 UI ││││Raa
5 UI ││││Rab
││││○ Rba, ¬Rbb, Raa, Rab ⇏⊥
│││├─
││││⊥ 3
││├─
3 IP │││Rbb 2
│├─
2 CP ││Rba → Rbb 1
├─
1 UG │∀x (Rxa → Rxx)

Counterexample presented by a diagram

Counterexample presented by tables

range: 1, 2  
ab
12
 
R 1 2 
1 T T 
2 T F