1. |
Define entailment by completing the following: Γ ⇒ φ if and only if … . (Your answer need not replicate the wording of the text’s definitions, but it should define entailment in terms of truth values and possible worlds. Remember that Γ is a set, not a sentence, though its members are sentences.)
answer |
2. |
Define absurdity by completing the following: φ is absurd if and only if … . (Your answer need not replicate the wording of the text’s definitions, but it should define absurdity in terms of truth values and possible worlds.)
answer |
3. |
Is it possible for there to be a pair of sentences j and y where (i) φ ⇔ ψ (i.e., φ and ψ are equivalent) and (ii) φ and ψ together form an inconsistent set (i.e., the set {φ, ψ} is inconsistent)? If it is possible for both (i) and (ii) to be true of a pair of sentences φ and ψ, describe (in terms of the possibilities for truth values) what φ and ψ must be like. If it is not possible, explain why in terms of possibilities for truth values. (Hint: this is not a trick question but it may trip you up if you try to answer it intuitively; you’ll do better to just think through the consequences of the definitions of equivalence and inconsistency.)
answer |
4. |
Give an example of implicature, presenting a sentence and describing situations in which it (i) is true and not misleading, (ii) is true but misleading, and (iii) is false. Explain your answer.
answer |
5. |
Analyze the sentence below in as much detail as possible, presenting the result in both symbolic and English notation (i.e., using both … and ). Be sure that the unanalyzed components of your answer are complete and independent sentences; also try to respect any grouping in the English.
The road was completed and opened to traffic, but it was closed for repairs and has not been re-opened
answer
|
Use derivations to check whether each of the entailments below holds. If one fails, present a counterexample by providing a table in which you calculate the truth values of the premises and conclusion on an extensional interpretation (i.e., an assignment of truth values) which divides an open gap. | ||
6. |
A ∧ B, C ∧ (D ∧ E) ⇒ B ∧ D
answer |
|
7. |
A ∧ B, D ∧ E ⇒ (A ∧ C) ∧ D
answer |
1. | Γ ⇒ φ if and only if there is no possible world in which φ is false while all members of Γ are true |
2. | φ is absurd if and only if there is no possible world in which φ is true |
6. |
|