Analyze the sentences below in as much detail as possible, providing a key to the non-logical vocabulary you use. Notice the special instructions for 2. | |
1. |
Only bears performed.
[answer] |
2. |
If everyone cheered, the elephant bowed. [In this case, restate your answer using an unrestricted quantifier.]
[answer] |
3. |
No one laughed at any performers except clowns.
[answer] |
Synthesize an English sentence with the following logical form: | |
4. |
(∀x: Px ∧ Cxt) Ctx
[C: λxy (x called y); P: λx (x is a person); t: Tom] [answer] |
Use derivations to establish the validity of the following arguments. You may use attachment rules. | ||||
5. |
|
|||
6. |
|
Use a derivation to show that the following argument is not valid and describe a structure (by using either a diagram or tables) that divides one of the derivation's open gaps. | ||||
7. |
|
1. |
Only bears performed (∀x: ¬ x is a bear) ¬ x performed
(∀x: ¬ Bx) ¬ Px
[B: λx (x is a bear); P: λx (x performed)]
|
4. |
(∀x: x is a person ∧ x called Tom) Tom called x (∀x: x is a person who called Tom) Tom called x everyone who called Tom is such that (Tom called him or her)
Tom called everyone who called him
|
5. |
|
6. |
|