Phi 110
Fall 2015
(Site navigation is not working.)
Phi 110 F15
Requirements: exam (1:30 p.m., Tues. 12/15)

In preparing for the exam, secure your understanding of each of the concepts, distinctions, and groups of related concepts below. In particular:

For each item, be able to supply (as appropriate) a short definition, explanation of a distinction, or account of the relation between concepts.

When related topics are listed for two philosophers, be able to compare their views in connection with these topics.

The exam will consist of essay questions that you can answer on the basis of your understanding of these ideas. Some questions may ask you simply to explain an idea; others will ask you about the relations among two or more ideas, perhaps ideas presented by different philosophers. You can expect some freedom of choice in the questions you answer but not enough to enable you to safely ignore more than a few items on this list.

In formulating this list, I have chosen terms or phrases that appear in the text, but some appear more prominently than others. If, as you are studying, you have any doubt about what I have in mind or where discussions of these ideas appear, I’ll be happy to supply more information.

Topics

Plato

piety and what the gods love

whether anyone does wrong voluntarily

unity of the virtues (e.g., the relation between courage and wisdom)

Aristotle

happiness (eudaimonia)

virtue as a mean

prudence

incontinence (akrasia)

justice in distribution and rectification

kinds of friendship

lives of theoretical study and of virtue concered with action

Mengzi

4 sprouts of virtue

goodness of human nature

filial piety (e.g., duty to parents)

Kant

a good will

hypothetical vs. categorical imperative

3 forms of the categorical imperative

Kant continued

autonomy vs. heteronomy

juridical vs. ethical duties

duties (e.g., truth-telling) and harmful consequences

Mill

quantity and quality of pleasure

feeling as the sanction of morality

justice and the principle of utility

Moore

naturalistic fallacy

Nagel

agent-neutral, autonomous agent-relative, and deontological agent-relative values

Sartre

existence precedes essence

anguish, forlornness, and despair

bad faith (or dishonesty)

Baier

trust vs. contract

test for the moral decency of trust