Phi 110 F10
 
Requirements: final exam (1:30 p.m. Thurs. 12/16)
 
 

In preparing for the exam, secure your understanding of each of the concepts, distinctions, and issues below. The exam will consist of essay questions that you can answer on the basis of your understanding of these ideas. Some questions may ask you simply to explain an idea; others will ask you about the relations among two or more ideas, perhaps ideas presented by different philosophers, or ask you to compare what two philosophers might say about a topic. You can expect some freedom of choice in the questions you answer but not enough to enable you to safely ignore more than a few items on this list.

In formulating this list, I have chosen terms or phrases that appear in the texts you’ve read, but some appear there more prominently than others. If, as you are studying, you have any doubt about what I have in mind or where discussions of these ideas appear, I’ll be happy to supply more information.

Topics

Plato

whether virtue is teachable

unity of the virtues

whether anyone ever willingly chooses something bad

relation of wisdom and courage

Aristotle

happiness (eudaimonia)

virtue as a mean

incontinence (akrasia)

prudence

kinds of friendship

lives of theoretical study and of virtue concered with action

Mengzi

4 sprouts of virtue

goodness of human nature

filial piety (e.g., duty to parents)

Kant

a good will

hypothetical vs. categorical imperative

Kant continued

3 forms of the categorical imperative

autonomy vs. heteronomy

strict vs. broad obligation

external and internal lying (i.e., lying as discussed both in “On a Supposed Right to Lie” and Doct. of Virt. §9)

Mill

quantity and quality of pleasure

feeling as the sanction of morality

justice and the principle of utility

Nagel

agent-neutral, autonomous agent-relative, and deontological agent-relative values

Sartre

existence precedes essence

bad faith

Baier

trust vs. contract

test for the moral decency of trust