Write an essay (of roughly 2-3 pp. or 600-900 words) on a topic appearing in your reading so far. The point of this paper is to give you a chance to explore further an issue of interest to you and to provide a basis for me to evaluate both your understanding of the material we’ve read and the depth of your thinking about a philosophical issue.

Your essay should include the following elements:

The first of these should be an exposition of a short passage or of a few related brief passages. The objection also take the form of an exposition of something in your reading, but it may be one of your own or one you can imagine being offered. That is, you may report an objection or speak for yourself, but it is also quite acceptable to present an objection that you can imagine but that is neither you own nor found in the reading.

Your writing assignments and our discussions are possible sources of topics for this paper, but don’t feel limited to them. Do be careful to keep whatever topic you choose fairly narrow; this is a short paper and it will be easier to achieve the depth of thought and clarity of writing I will be looking for if you do not attempt to cover too much ground.

Be careful also not to attempt to give an exposition of someone’s views by paraphrasing, or even summarizing in a way that merely follows the order of the text; you do not have enough space in this short paper to do that effectively. Instead think through what is said and design an account of it to suit the topic you are addressing and the space you have available.

As with your assignments, I’ll be happy to accept your essay on paper, but I encourage you to submit it by e-mail (either as an attachment or, if there is no special formatting, in the body of a message). My address is helmang@wabash.edu.