Freshman Colloquium (“Enduring Questions”)* 14I
Spring 2014—Glen Helman
Instructor: Glen Helman, Assoc. Prof. of Philosophy and Dept. Chair
E-mail: helmang@wabash.edu
Office: Center 214, (765) 361-6334
My posted hours currently are 1:10-2 on M and 3:10-4 on F (but this can change). I usually arrive on campus between 9 and 10 and leave between 5 and 6, and you stand a good chance of finding me in my office whenever I am not teaching (my other classes meet at 10 and 2:10 MWF). While I am in my office most noon hours, the noon hour is also a common time for meetings and other events, as is the afternoon after 4.
Home: 314 W. Wabash Ave., (765) 362-0428
This is your best bet evenings and weekends, but try my office too.
Cell phone: (765) 366-0791
Texts
Texts available in the bookstore:
Stephen Mitchell (ed.), Gilgamesh (Free Press, 2004).
Mary Shelley, Frankenstein (Oxford Univ. Pr., 2008).
William Shakespeare, Macbeth, The RSC Shakespeare (Modern Library, 2009).
Wes Moore, The Other Wes Moore (Spiegel & Grau, 2011).
Plato (Grube, tr.), The Trial and Death of Socrates (Hackett, 2000).
Graham Greene, The Power and the Glory (Penguin Books, 1990).
Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons, Watchmen (DC Comics, 1986).
Philip Ivanhoe (tr.), The Daodejing of Laozi (Hackett, 2001).
William Placher, The Tradition We Inherit (Wabash College, 2009).
Texts and other material on Moodle or on line elsewhere (check the section E Moodle site first):
artists’ self portraits (PDF)
Descartes and Locke on people and animals (handout)
Juan Carlos Gómez, “Are Apes Persons? The Case for Primate Intersubjectivity” (PDF)
Augustine, Confessions, books 1 and 2 (PDF)
Peter Berger, “Sociological Perspective—Society in Man,” ch. 5 of Invitation to Sociology (PDF)
V. S. Ramachandran, “The Neurons That Shaped Civilization,” ch. 4 of The Tell-Tale Brain (PDF)
Plato, Republic, selections (514a-517a, 519b-520e) from book 7 (handout)
Protest songs (details TBA)
Edward Abbey, “Polemic: Industrial Tourism and the National Parks” from Desert Solitaire: A Season in the Wilderness (PDF)
Michael Pollan, “The Omnivore’s Dilemma,” ch. 16 of The Omnivore’s Dilemma (PDF)
David Freedman, “How Junk Food Can End Obesity” from The Atlantic (July/August, 2013) (on line)
Showings and performances:
Blade Runner (showings 2/4 and TBA)
Macbeth (performances 2/26-3/1)
Rabbit-Proof Fence (showings 4/15 and TBA)
Food, Inc. (streaming and showings TBA)
Grading
Requirements: (1) Four papers (the first 2-3 pp., the second and third 4-5 pp. each, and the last 6-8 pp. in length, with an abstract of 1-2 pp. prepared for discussion in class). I will specify the forms of these papers, but you will have substantial freedom of choice in the topics. (2) A number of less formal, shorter, and ungraded assignments. (3) Attendance and participation in class discussion. Your final grade will be based on these in the following way: 8%, 14%, 14%, and 24% for the papers and 40% for class participation (including completion of the ungraded assignments).
Discussion grading: The major factor in your participation grade will be your contributions to class discussion (which, of course, includes your attendance). When evaluating these contributions, I’ll pay most attention to the following activities (in rough order of importance):
• asking questions
• commenting on something someone else has said
• working to draw people into the discussion
• trying to answer others’ questions
• reflecting on the direction of the discussion
Of course, contributing good ideas about whatever we are discussing counts for something, but it can provide the basis for any of the activities above. And using good ideas in these ways is what makes for real participation in discussion.
You will sometimes find that you haven’t been able to contribute as much as you wanted or in the way that you wanted. If so, you can submit a brief statement of “What I wish I had said.” This won’t count as much as saying the same thing in the discussion would have, but it will count for something. (It should reach me the same day as the discussion in question, and I’ll accept it only for discussions you actually attended.)
Attendance and due dates: To be excused from discussion, you will need a good reason (and the need to complete work for other classes is not a good reason). My standards for a good reason will be lower if you let me know in advance, and they may increase if you have been excused before. The due dates given for papers are default due dates, and I will be willing to negotiate and re-negotiate individual deadlines (within reason) if these are inconvenient. If you miss a deadline (either the default or one you have negotiated), I will expect you to contact me promptly to either turn in the work or arrange a new deadline. My standards for excusing missed deadlines are comparable to those for excusing missed class discussions after the fact, and unexcused missed deadlines will tend to affect your participation grade.
Calendar
Calendar. The assignments below are approximate and tentative. There will sometimes be a reading guide that gives further details of the assignment and may include passages that are part of your assignment. Boxed dates are default due dates for papers (and links to assignments when they are bold).
1/20 | introduction | |
1/22 | Placher, “The Professors Appeared, and the Exercises Commenced …” (The Tradition We Inherit, pp. 22-27) | |
1/24 | emblems, devices, and self-portraits | |
1/27 | emblems, devices, and self-portraits (cont’d) | |
1/29 | Gilgamesh, prol. and bks. I-VI (Mitchell, pp. 69-140) | |
1/31 | Gilgamesh, bks. VII-XI (Mitchell, pp. 141-199) | |
2/3 | Locke and Descartes on people and animals (handout) | |
2/5 | Blade Runner (movie, showings 2/4 and TBA) | |
2/7 | Gomez, “Are Apes Persons? The Case for Primate Intersubjectivity” (on Canvas) | |
2/10 | Shelley, Frankenstein chs. 1-8 (pp. 1-89) | |
2/12 | Shelley, Frankenstein, chs. 9-17 (pp. 90-149) | |
2/14 | Shelley, Frankenstein, chs. 18-24 (pp. 149-223) | |
2/17 | Augustine, Confessions, bks. 1 and 2 (on Canvas) | |
2/19 | Berger, “Sociological Perspective—Society in Man” (on Canvas, pp. 93-110) | |
2/21 | Berger, “Sociological Perspective—Society in Man” (on Canvas, pp. 110-121) | |
2/24 | Ramachandran, “The Neurons That Shaped Civilization” (on Canvas) | |
2/26 | Shakespeare, Macbeth, through act 3, scene 3 (RSC ed., pp. 4-48) | |
2/28 | Shakespeare, Macbeth, act 3, scene 4, to end (RSC ed., pp. 49-94) | |
3/3 | The Other Wes Moore, intro. and pt. 1 (pp. xi-xiv, 1-62) | |
3/5 | The Other Wes Moore, pt. 2 (pp. 63-122) | |
3/7 | The Other Wes Moore, pt. 3 and interview (pp. 123-183, 243-248) | |
spring break | ||
3/17 | Plato, Republic, bk. 7 sels. (handout) | |
3/19 | Plato, Apology sels.: 17a-24b, 28a-32a, 35b-39d (The Trial and Death of Socrates, pp. 20-27, 31-34, 37-42) | |
3/21 | Plato, Crito (The Trial and Death of Socrates, pp. 43-54) | |
3/24 | Graham Greene, The Power and the Glory, pt. 1 (pp. 7-58) | |
3/26 | Graham Greene, The Power and the Glory, pt. 2 (pp. 59-159) | |
3/28 | Graham Greene, The Power and the Glory, pts. 3-4 (pp. 161-222) | |
3/31 | protest songs (on Canvas) | |
4/2 | protest songs cont’d (on Canvas) | |
4/4 | Moore, Watchmen, chs. I-IV | |
4/7 | Moore, Watchmen, chs. V-VIII | |
4/9 | Moore, Watchmen, chs. IX-XII | |
4/11 | The Daodejing of Laozi, bk. 1 = chs. 1-37 (Ivanhoe, pp. 1-37) | |
4/14 | Daodejing, bk. 2 = chs. 38-81) (Ivanhoe, pp. 41-84) | |
4/16 | Rabbit-Proof Fence (movie, showings 4/15 and TBA) | |
4/18 | Pollan, “The Omnivore’s Dilemma” (on Canvas) | |
4/21 | Food, inc. (movie, showings TBA) | |
4/23 | Freedman, “How Junk Food Can End Obesity” (on Canvas) | |
4/25 | paper abstract discussions | |
4/28 | paper abstract discussions | |
4/30 | paper abstract discussions | |
5/2 | Placher, “A College’s Use of its Past” and “Wabash, 1907” (The Tradition We Inherit, pp. 14-21, 28-32) | |
5/9 | Fri. of exam week |
* The following is an official description that is intended to apply to all sections of the course:
Humans ask questions. From the beginning of civilization, deep questions have marked our cultures across the globe. Who am I? What do I know? What is the good life? How shall we live? Who is my neighbor?
A liberal arts education enshrines the question. Questions drive us to deliberate, to discuss, to investigate, to ask more questions. They are at the core of every class, research project, and creative work. They are the catalyst for and the evidence of a liberal arts mind.
In this class they are the explicit framework for discussion over the course of the semester. As such, this course is a foundational part of your journey into the liberal arts at Wabash College: asking enduring questions; interrogating the questions and questioners; and generating new, enduring questions for yourself.
No one discipline has a monopoly on asking these enduring questions. In this course we honor the classic pursuits of religion, philosophy, and literature. We look as well to the sciences and social sciences and to new, emerging disciplines to inform our questions of humanity and community. We explore multiple genres of literature and art, essays, drama, music, film, and new media. And of course no professor has all the answers or even all the questions. Thus, faculty and student are co-questioners and co-learners in the common exploration of these enduring questions.
We have organized the texts of this course around two enduring questions, "Who am I?" and "How do we live in the world?" and thus have chosen texts that are likely to speak, quite obviously, to one or the other of these questions. However, you will also find in the course of reading, viewing, and discussing that these questions overlap and that the texts are frames overflowing with other questions as well. We encourage you to explore these other questions without restraint or apology. Indeed, in this course, we celebrate questions of all kinds and forms.
EQ Course Goals
1. Fostering foundational intellectual skills inherent in critical thinking
EQ is devoted to helping students develop foundational interrelated intellectual skills that are a fundamental part of liberal education and educated citizenry in the 21st century.
a) Students will become more careful and considerate readers. They will become more aware of their own reading skills and habits, recognizing strengths and weaknesses so they can improve critical reading abilities across a variety of types of texts: identifying and analyzing arguments; understanding how literary form and structure function in a text; evaluating the quality of evidence presented in a text; and being open to consider additional questions and broader implications of a text’s argument for their lives and society.
b) Students will become more effective discussants. Students will improve discussion skills by engaging in various styles of oral presentation, including not just oppositional argument, but also conversation that builds upon, extends, and sharpens their own and others’ arguments and reveals the foundations on which their and others’ positions and questions are built. Students will listen effectively to the ideas of others, and thus, will approach discussions as an opportunity to achieve a richer understanding of the topic and issues under discussion.
d) Students will become more effective writers. EQ will build upon the writing instruction students receive in Freshman Tutorial by engaging students in multiple types of writing (including both informal and formal writing) and in writing for a variety of purposes, including but not limited to summary, interpretation, and comparison of texts. EQ will foster, among other things, students’ abilities to write about the principle ideas and arguments within one text and about how multiple texts speak to a common theme or idea.
2. Fostering meaningful relationships
EQ will encourage meaningful relationships among students, between students and alumni, and between students and faculty and staff, relationships that are grounded in common intellectual experiences and rigorous intellectual discussion about questions that matter.
3. Encouraging consideration of important questions
Students will be inspired to further thinking and discussion with others about complex, meaningful questions with which society has wrestled for centuries and with which contemporary society continues to struggle, albeit in new forms and manifestations and as informed by new technologies and perspectives.